American Land Title Association (ALTA) Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Question: 1 / 50

According to the surveying standards, what should be prioritized when conflicts arise?

Consulting legal counsel

Avoiding any changes to the survey

Applying the more stringent standards

When conflicts arise in surveying, prioritizing the application of the more stringent standards is essential to ensure accuracy, compliance, and legal validity. Adhering to more rigorous standards helps to prevent disputes over property boundaries, easements, or other critical aspects that can arise from less exact surveying practices. This approach not only safeguards the integrity of the survey but also provides a solid foundation for resolving conflicts, as it takes into account the highest level of detail and regulation. This choice also underscores the importance of professionalism and ethical responsibility in surveying. Surveyors are obligated to uphold industry standards and practices that protect all parties involved, including clients, future property owners, and the public interest. By applying the stricter standards, a surveyor demonstrates diligence and a commitment to excellence, thereby fostering trust and credibility in their work. In contrast, simply following client instructions without question could lead to discrepancies or issues down the line, while consulting legal counsel may be appropriate in certain situations but does not directly address the immediate resolution of surveying conflicts. Avoiding changes altogether can also ignore necessary adjustments to correct errors or clarify boundary lines. Thus, focusing on the more stringent standards effectively balances the need for precise, reliable surveying and conflict resolution.

Following the client's instructions blindly

Next

Report this question